I have just spent a few days with an Arctic explorer who was insistent that ice volumes are reducing and that climate change is a major problem. However when I suggested that the "problem" was being exploited to employ people unnecessarily he was not amused.
We spend vast fortunes investigating Climate Change using the problem as an excuse to employ large numbers of scientists to fiddle around "investigating "the problem".
The Horizon 2020 project is one and here is another
:BONUS EEIG - SOILS2SEA
This is what these people do. They actually do nothing whatsoever other than talk and waffle:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6Fts-3fOZY
What gives these organisations their integrity is governments (the EU in particular)journalists and zealots who manipulate us into accepting the need to employ these people. When all they are really doing is exploiting Climate Change to give themselves political and personal moral integrity and thus raise taxes.
It may all change however as the US government is changing its view about geo technical solutions (after all it is Geo technical activity that is causing the pollution so why should it not provide the solution?)
Climate engineering: No idea is too crazy to save the earth
So instead of paying hundreds of millions to the likes of "BONUS" BONUS EEIG - SOILS2SEA maybe we could pay £10.00 for a bottle of "lotion" to stick in a fish tank and see if it works.
We spend vast fortunes investigating Climate Change using the problem as an excuse to employ large numbers of scientists to fiddle around "investigating "the problem".
The Horizon 2020 project is one and here is another
:BONUS EEIG - SOILS2SEA
This is what these people do. They actually do nothing whatsoever other than talk and waffle:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6Fts-3fOZY
What gives these organisations their integrity is governments (the EU in particular)journalists and zealots who manipulate us into accepting the need to employ these people. When all they are really doing is exploiting Climate Change to give themselves political and personal moral integrity and thus raise taxes.
It may all change however as the US government is changing its view about geo technical solutions (after all it is Geo technical activity that is causing the pollution so why should it not provide the solution?)
Climate engineering: No idea is too crazy to save the earth
So instead of paying hundreds of millions to the likes of "BONUS" BONUS EEIG - SOILS2SEA maybe we could pay £10.00 for a bottle of "lotion" to stick in a fish tank and see if it works.
Comment