Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I believe it would be a surprise a GE at this point not ending in an even more divided HoC.
It will be just as divided, but there will be a new "mandate" and majority for either hard Brexit by Con/Brexit or 2nd referendum which is looking to be in the manifesto of everyone else. ATM there is no "outspoken" majority for either, just a bunch of MPs torn between party lines and their conscious/constituency.
If it's the former - it's done and dusted.
If it's the latter - Hopefully this time the question will be better defined and the referendum actually legally binding (if possible under current law). Then it will be the new will of the people and parliament won't have much wriggle room.
Any sane person knows that the results of the first referendum were bogus - rampant misinformation and blatant lies and massive "anti-establishment/protest" vote that wasn't exactly pro-Brexit as anti-Westminster. Nowadays after 3+ years of heated debates on TV in Parliament and in the pubs throughout the land, most people have much more focused/clear opinion on the matter.
Given that Scotland can already export whisky to 70% of the world via current EU trade deals, what do you consider to be the that advantage of leaving that for trade deals that don't exist and won't for at least a couple of years ?
Well that's the conundrum that has got parliament so twisted up. Some want a hard brexit where WTO rules apply until a trade deal is in place, others want some form of soft-brexit transition period so current EU rules apply, and others want to remain with no brexit.
As it is, the state of trade is yet to be decided dependent on what form of brexit is agreed. On one hand there is scope to keep the existing EU trade rules and tariffs (not like UK stuff will suddenly no longer meet EU regulations, so keep trading as is until a new agreement is finalised), and on the other there is the potential to do a quick deal with the USA to avoid the potential USA/EU trade war which would improve the situation relating to scotch whisky.
The USA have already said they would break the trade deal into parts so the easier to establish parts can be put in place sooner than waiting for the whole deal to be finalised. Nowt easier than saying the whisky is tariff free if the jocks buy enough deep fried chlorinated chicken, which they will do.
Maybe tomorrow, I'll want to settle down. Until tomorrow, I'll just keep moving on.
Well that's the conundrum that has got parliament so twisted up. Some want a hard brexit where WTO rules apply until a trade deal is in place, others want some form of soft-brexit transition period so current EU rules apply, and others want to remain with no brexit.
As it is, the state of trade is yet to be decided dependent on what form of brexit is agreed. On one hand there is scope to keep the existing EU trade rules and tariffs (not like UK stuff will suddenly no longer meet EU regulations, so keep trading as is until a new agreement is finalised), and on the other there is the potential to do a quick deal with the USA to avoid the potential USA/EU trade war which would improve the situation relating to scotch whisky.
The USA have already said they would break the trade deal into parts so the easier to establish parts can be put in place sooner than waiting for the whole deal to be finalised. Nowt easier than saying the whisky is tariff free if the jocks buy enough deep fried chlorinated chicken, which they will do.
So, in answer to my question......no advantages.
When freedom comes along, don't PISH in the water supply.....
Well that's the conundrum that has got parliament so twisted up. Some want a hard brexit where WTO rules apply until a trade deal is in place, others want some form of soft-brexit transition period so current EU rules apply, and others want to remain with no brexit.
As it is, the state of trade is yet to be decided dependent on what form of brexit is agreed. On one hand there is scope to keep the existing EU trade rules and tariffs (not like UK stuff will suddenly no longer meet EU regulations, so keep trading as is until a new agreement is finalised), and on the other there is the potential to do a quick deal with the USA to avoid the potential USA/EU trade war which would improve the situation relating to scotch whisky.
The USA have already said they would break the trade deal into parts so the easier to establish parts can be put in place sooner than waiting for the whole deal to be finalised. Nowt easier than saying the whisky is tariff free if the jocks buy enough deep fried chlorinated chicken, which they will do.
If anyone truly believes any trade deal with the USA under Trump will benefit the UK i any way, really needs an urgent trip to the doctor...
Trump was happy to wreck decades of cooperation with his closest neighbours - Mexico and Canda by tearing up NAFTA. Then started a pissing contest with freaking China. Why on earth would he give the UK any better treatment?
Forget lower standard food like chlorinated chicken and hormone laden beef. That will be the tip of the iceberg, the distraction. The real "deal" will be financial de-regulations and dead to the NHS. It won't be straight off privatisation - this isn't ever going to fly, but it will be slow degradation fuelled by a combination of lack of skilled labour, low wages and overpriced drugs supplied by our US overlords.
People will be slowly weened of the NHS through reasonably priced private medical insurance offering much better service (already happening for higher earners). Until there are enough people questioning why the hell do they keep paying for the NHS if they mainly end up using the private medical.
Comment