Originally posted by mudskipper
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
6 month Clause in my Agency Contract restricting me going direct
Collapse
X
-
-
Have many of you paid off an agent like this in the past?
How much did you pay?
But risky if things go tits up at client co, their budget gets cancelled, and they terminate you.Comment
-
Originally posted by mudskipper View PostAlso worth remembering the agent does add some value, even if it doesn't seem like it
Assuming you get paid promptly, on time, then that is a big plus. I worked direct for a while, and without exception, was chasing every invoice. Typically 2-3 months till I got paid. It caused bad feeling when I threatened to charge them interest - and, perhaps coincidentally, my contract terminated soon afterwards.
At current clientCo, agent pays me 14 weeks after the end of the month. Another contractor who went direct was waiting 45 days, although AFAIK, he was then always paid 'on time'.
Knowing the money will be in yourCo's bank at the right time is a big plus.
My current contract is invoice at the end of the month, payment 60 days later. Whilst I like the thought of still getting paid months after I leave, waiting for the first invoice (including two weeks in their offshore office, all expenses paid) was a bit of a worry.Comment
-
this is a concern to me too
My contract with client and recruitment agency ended the other month but I see there is a small clause in the contract saying I cannot work for the same client again for the next 6 months.
Client is huge and has sites all over the UK and globe. Other agencies are saying this is not an issue or concern as I would be taking out a new job with a new role. Old agent won't know or pursue and its more bark than bite.
However the ownership would be on me and it could potential be me pursues legally.
Is this something to be concerned about and stop me working and have people actually be legally pursues before.
Want to understand risk and likelihood
Thanks
555Comment
-
Originally posted by contractor555 View PostMy contract with client and recruitment agency ended the other month but I see there is a small clause in the contract saying I cannot work for the same client again for the next 6 months.
Client is huge and has sites all over the UK and globe. Other agencies are saying this is not an issue or concern as I would be taking out a new job with a new role. Old agent won't know or pursue and its more bark than bite.
However the ownership would be on me and it could potential be me pursues legally.
Is this something to be concerned about and stop me working and have people actually be legally pursues before.
Want to understand risk and likelihood
Thanks
555
In the thread state you have searched for answers and can't find one that fits your situation.
Do this NOW."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
-
Use the term handcuff and use the search method as described in the FAQ section. You'll find your answer in no time.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
apologies, i tried created a new thread but it wasn't happening as i'm new to the site today. Maybe it takes 24 hours to be moderated. Need some info asap as big decisions to make. Will search FAQ so thank youComment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostUse the term handcuff and use the search method as described in the FAQ section. You'll find your answer in no time.Comment
-
Originally posted by contractor555 View PostOther agencies are saying this is not an issue or concern as I would be taking out a new job with a new role. Old agent won't know or pursue and its more bark than bite.Comment
-
Originally posted by contractor555 View PostWhat is Agent A is totally taking the mick like 40% and client is huge and has also Agent B C D & E. If contractor comes back under agent B or C how likely is Agent A to find out and if so would they sue the contractor in courts. Agent B and C have told contractor he is now free for new assignment and not to worry its more bark then bite. But contractor needs to understand risk and if people get sued regular.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment