• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

What the f**K???

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by barrydidit View Post
    He's not a suitable role model. Planning violations on a private island holiday home? He's a greedy boomer, and no mistake. Bear Grylls' steel slide removed from his private island after planning officials launch probe | Daily Mail Online
    Ha
    http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
      It's the norm with boys/young men.

      What the media are now showing is girls/young women are just as mean.
      for someone who calls out sexism against women all the time on here you're pretty dumb with your male generalisations

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
        You actually want extended families so when there is illness, disability, death or whatever people take up the challenge rather than expecting the state to look after their parent or other relation. In encouraging that you also get people looking after their neighbours.

        Some of the kids who end up in foster care do so because there is no relation, neighbour or family friend to look after them due to their parent being ill or dead. Others you don't tend to hear about have escaped it simply because they have got this.
        Probably true. The extended family provides a lot of care and it's reasonable for the state to assist them with that. Morally right and economic sense. The immediate family provides even more care.

        I realize that not everyone has a family, or a capable one. But all people had 2 parents, and the state should focus more on promoting and encouraging the nuclear (and thereby the extended) family. Unfortunately, the Left spent 40 years ('65 to about '05) denigrating the family, mistaking it for an "oppressive" or "patriarchal" structure, when in fact it is key to the human condition and is the solution to many social problems.

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by unixman View Post
          Probably true. The extended family provides a lot of care and it's reasonable for the state to assist them with that. Morally right and economic sense. The immediate family provides even more care.

          I realize that not everyone has a family, or a capable one. But all people had 2 parents, and the state should focus more on promoting and encouraging the nuclear (and thereby the extended) family. Unfortunately, the Left spent 40 years ('65 to about '05) denigrating the family, mistaking it for an "oppressive" or "patriarchal" structure, when in fact it is key to the human condition and is the solution to many social problems.
          These days both parents often have to work to pay the bills. Could this have a negative impact on raising kids?
          http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
            These days both parents often have to work to pay the bills. Could this have a negative impact on raising kids?
            Two words... income shifting

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
              These days both parents often have to work to pay the bills. Could this have a negative impact on raising kids?
              Those parents have chosen to have a number of children that requires them both to work. That will make their lives more difficult and enable them to spend less time with their children. In their position I would have chosen to have fewer children, or tolerate a materially poorer life style. However, it is their choice and they are free to make it.

              The default expectation that many parents will both work is an indicator of the way society regards the nuclear family.
              Last edited by unixman; 6 April 2016, 10:18. Reason: none of your bees wax

              Comment

              Working...
              X