• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Announcement

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Lance View Post
    I don't. Well I believe they exist, but also that they should not.


    FTFY
    It's nuts isn't it? Sometimes you'll hear people say that it makes money for the UK, but then they refuse to engage in a free market solution to put the monarchy out to competitive tender, to see if the UK can get a more economically advantageous contract than the one with the incumbent monarchic service providers.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
      It's nuts isn't it? Sometimes you'll hear people say that it makes money for the UK, but then they refuse to engage in a free market solution to put the monarchy out to competitive tender, to see if the UK can get a more economically advantageous contract than the one with the incumbent monarchic service providers.
      voted for in an X-factor style compo every 10 years?
      And only one castle. Sell the rest.

      Graham Norton can do the Queen's speech. He's already paid enough for it.
      See You Next Tuesday

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Lance View Post
        voted for in an X-factor style compo every 10 years?
        And only one castle. Sell the rest.

        Graham Norton can do the Queen's speech. He's already paid enough for it.
        Such vulgarity could lessen the economic value of the monarchy. All that's needed is a robust competitive tender, and we'll see what comes out. Maybe there will be creative 'offers' that go down the kinds of path you describe. Maybe a bidder will opt for a traditional approach. One of the oil rich sheikhs may come in with a belter of an offer, because they're looking to get a foot-hold in the European monarchy market.

        The free market will sort it out.

        Comment


          #34
          You shower of ingrates. Think of all the tulip one has opened for you over the years. If this carries on one might well go round and close it all again.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by PhiltheGreek View Post
            You shower of ingrates. Think of all the tulip one has opened for you over the years. If this carries on one might well go round and close it all again.
            You're being auctioned off for parts.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
              Such vulgarity could lessen the economic value of the monarchy. All that's needed is a robust competitive tender, and we'll see what comes out. Maybe there will be creative 'offers' that go down the kinds of path you describe. Maybe a bidder will opt for a traditional approach. One of the oil rich sheikhs may come in with a belter of an offer, because they're looking to get a foot-hold in the European monarchy market.

              The free market will sort it out.
              You'll need to factor in the economic shock of there suddenly being no gays in Britain. All those pink pounds will have to go offshore to Holland or something. An idea like this needs to be thought through carefully. Get Suity to workshop it and submit his best 3 proposals.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
                You're being auctioned off for parts.
                Caveat emptor

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by PhiltheGreek View Post
                  You'll need to factor in the economic shock of there suddenly being no gays in Britain. All those pink pounds will have to go offshore to Holland or something. An idea like this needs to be thought through carefully. Get Suity to workshop it and submit his best 3 proposals.
                  Suity is excluded from working on the tender execise as a potential bidder.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Lance View Post
                    Yes William is 2nd in line. But if Big Ears abdicates he gives up his, and his heirs right to the throne. Doesn't he?

                    Edward VIII had no heirs so not a precedent that backs up my argument though. In fact there isn't a precedent so it would be a 'constitutional crisis' in the press.

                    This the closest precedent I guess... "In June 2014, King Juan Carlos of Spain announced his intent to abdicate in favor of his son, Felipe." - Source Wikipedia- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdication

                    But I am not a hereditary lineage, monarchical constitutional law expert.
                    For Big Ears to abdicate he has to become sovereign, by which time William will be heir presumptive, even if Maj out lives her eldest the rules of succession would still go to William, we are safe from Edward or Andrew unless something really drastic happens
                    Originally posted by Stevie Wonder Boy
                    I can't see any way to do it can you please advise?

                    I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
                      Suity is excluded from working on the tender execise as a potential bidder.
                      I've seen his submission bid. He's lost weight for it, I think.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X