Originally posted by DimPrawn
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Belgium and UK have the highest COVID case fatality rates (CFR)
Collapse
X
-
Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodeal -
Belgium and the UK are highest in the the number of deaths per 100 confirmed cases. This could simply be because we are not testing as many, only the more serious cases. I would have thought the more meaningful figure is deaths per 100,000 population for which we are well behind Belgium, Spain, Italy and France.
A major factor here is probably population density, Belgium is one of most densely populated countries in Europe and the UK is significantly more crowded than Germany and France. Even with identical effective measures we would expect Belgium and the UK to have higher rates, it's basic maths. In fact, France has a significantly higher rate, which may indicate they have been less effective at prevention.
Of course there are delays in these things, Italy is high because it started spreading there first, no saying that the UK could not match or exceed it. Also as you said, the UK is only counting hospital deaths, so the real figure may be quite a bit higher. However, it seems likely we have passed our peak now that we have had controls for a few weeks.
A lot of uncertainty and we will have to wait and see but I don't think there is, as yet, a firm case for the CUK government bashers.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Gordon Bennet! San Marino - 115.44 Deaths/100k pop. What's going on there?
Ah Very small population and lots of Italians.bloggoth
If everything isn't black and white, I say, 'Why the hell not?'
John Wayne (My guru, not to be confused with my beloved prophet Jeremy Clarkson)Comment
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostBelgium and the UK are highest in the the number of deaths per 100 confirmed cases. This could simply be because we are not testing as many, only the more serious cases. I would have thought the more meaningful figure is deaths per 100,000 population for which we are well behind Belgium, Spain, Italy and France.
A major factor here is probably population density, Belgium is one of most densely populated countries in Europe and the UK is significantly more crowded than Germany and France. Even with identical effective measures we would expect Belgium and the UK to have higher rates, it's basic maths. In fact, France has a significantly higher rate, which may indicate they have been less effective at prevention.
Of course there are delays in these things, Italy is high because it started spreading there first, no saying that the UK could not match or exceed it. Also as you said, the UK is only counting hospital deaths, so the real figure may be quite a bit higher. However, it seems likely we have passed our peak now that we have had controls for a few weeks.
A lot of uncertainty and we will have to wait and see but I don't think there is, as yet, a firm case for the CUK government bashers.Comment
-
It's now clear that Boris has surrounded himself with useless sycophants who basically haven't clue, and Boris will be out of action for the forseeable future, focusing on his breathing. There seems to be no plan to get out of it. The "blame China" strategy will gain traction. That won't be helpful on the otherside when investment is needed. Britain may have seized back control but the captain has gone AWOL and the ship is rudderless.I'm alright JackComment
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostA major factor here is probably population density, Belgium is one of most densely populated countries in Europe and the UK is significantly more crowded than Germany and France. Even with identical effective measures we would expect Belgium and the UK to have higher rates, it's basic maths. In fact, France has a significantly higher rate, which may indicate they have been less effective at prevention.
.
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostNursing and care home deaths are the elephant in the room. Not just in the UK.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Andrew Marr had a professor on this morning who give some straight answers
Everyone should listen
25mins in ish on iPlayer
Sent from my iPhone using Contractor UK ForumComment
-
Originally posted by xoggoth View Post
A lot of uncertainty and we will have to wait and see but I don't think there is, as yet, a firm case for the CUK government bashers.
And avoiding the issue merely leads to further decline.
The other elephant in the room is the rise in excess deaths for all other non-Covid causes as hospitals are re-purposed for Covid.
On a shoestring budget as the NHS has been for years, these will be higher than in countries which have higher rates pro rata of hospital and ICU beds.
The data in the Uk is already reflecting this: Covid cases are being coped with but at the expense of everything else.
Whereas in Belgium which also has a high rate, only half of ICU beds are taken up by Covid patients, reflecting higher capacity.
In Germany I am told hospitals are empty, their expected surge didn't happen and they have the highest ratio of ICU and hospital beds in Europe.
2 choices after this all over: (1) hold your politicians to account and demand change or (2) go into typical "musn't grumble" mode.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostNo. The reason for the high rates of death in Belgium is that (1) half of all COVID deaths are in care and nursing homes and (2) they are recording those deaths, unlike the Uk.
Not in Belgium. They are aware of and recording those deaths and heads are beginning to roll.
The statistic mentioned has nothing to do with testing, in fact the stats are: number of covid19 deaths per 100000 of the population. The latter 100000 is not tested cases, it's just an easier way of comparing countries without looking at the testing ratio.
Originally posted by xoggoth View PostBelgium and the UK are highest in the the number of deaths per 100 confirmed cases. This could simply be because we are not testing as many, only the more serious cases. I would have thought the more meaningful figure is deaths per 100,000 population for which we are well behind Belgium, Spain, Italy and France.
Covid19 positive death cases (excluding care homes in England) per 100000 of the general entire population regardless of testing status (can be extrapolated to the full country size.) This means that it doesn't matter how many people outside of the hospital setting are untested, as those will generally make it to a hospital if they have severe illness and there if dying there will count towards the total number of deaths per 100000 of the general population.
Scotland is including deaths in which covid19 is mentioned on the death certificate, so the NRS (National Records of Scotland) publication is a good guide to the true number of deaths in Scotland as it includes the crucial parameters from inside and outside of the hospital in which Covid19 is mentioned at all on the death certificate, even if it's not cited as the cause of death; this doesn't involve testing the patient after they've died in a care home or at home, but instead just relying on the GP mentioning Covid19 on the death certificate and then it's included. England aren't doing this and so the number of deaths is artificially low and in essence a false, useless statistic.
Channel4 news have highlighted that GPs in England are encouraged to avoid writing Covid19 on death certificates and to ease administration and their own use of time are writing "pneumonia" or similar on the death cert; a future scandal in the making.Last edited by rogerfederer; 19 April 2020, 09:21.Comment
-
Originally posted by rogerfederer View PostXoggoth is wrong in another way.
The statistic mentioned has nothing to do with testing, .
The CFR denominator is patients tested positive for Covid.
Xog has a point that the CFR could be higher if there is low testing or testing only for very ill patients.
Hence my disclaimer in the first post, that these things will come out in the wash.
But we can already see that some countries have coped with it better - the biggest mistake in the UK was postponing lockdown when every day mattered.
Cheltenham, anyone?Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment