Originally posted by DimPrawn
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Second Wave
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostI just bought a ton of nicotine gum just incase....I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostScooty called this .... well, he'll post a graph later telling us to buy BAT and he'll draw a random line upwards to support his narrative.Comment
-
Here's a question or two .......
1) Aren't many people poo-pooing herd immunity as a stupid idea? Yet herd immunity is based in a large part on the assumption that once someone has been infected by the virus, they have anti-bodies, and so they can't be re-infected
2) Vaccines 'fool' the body into thinking it has been infected by the virus and then the body creates anti-bodies that stop the person being infected in future
Surely if 2) is possible so is 1)? And all those who argued that Boris and pals following 1) were idiots, should now be arguing that 2) is not possible.
Discuss (if you can be @rsed!)I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostHere's a question or two .......
1) Aren't many people poo-pooing herd immunity as a stupid idea? Yet herd immunity is based in a large part on the assumption that once someone has been infected by the virus, they have anti-bodies, and so they can't be re-infected
2) Vaccines 'fool' the body into thinking it has been infected by the virus and then the body creates anti-bodies that stop the person being infected in future
Surely if 2) is possible so is 1)? And all those who argued that Boris and pals following 1) were idiots, should now be arguing that 2) is not possible.
Discuss (if you can be @rsed!)Comment
-
Originally posted by Whorty View PostHere's a question or two .......
1) Aren't many people poo-pooing herd immunity as a stupid idea? Yet herd immunity is based in a large part on the assumption that once someone has been infected by the virus, they have anti-bodies, and so they can't be re-infected
2) Vaccines 'fool' the body into thinking it has been infected by the virus and then the body creates anti-bodies that stop the person being infected in future
Surely if 2) is possible so is 1)? And all those who argued that Boris and pals following 1) were idiots, should now be arguing that 2) is not possible.
Discuss (if you can be @rsed!)Comment
-
Originally posted by sasguru View Post
No new drugs were ever developed in the old Soviet Union, AFAIK.
Although a niche treatment, I believe it is very effective in certain cases, and natural bacteriophage viruses kill most cholera bacteria in Asian rivers.Work in the public sector? Read the IR35 FAQ hereComment
-
Originally posted by DimPrawn View PostCan't be @rsed, but I do think Boris is a useless bumbling tw@t if that helps?I am what I drink, and I'm a bitter manComment
-
Originally posted by Old Greg View PostHerd immunity is a good strategy if to be achieved by vaccination, not if to be achieved by everyone getting sick. Health systems would collapse under the latter approach.
It's lucky that Neill Ferguson, and his colleagues at Imperial, were so appalled that they produced their seminal and influential paper, written mainly over the weekend of mid March.
And lucky that his influence was such that there was a complete U-turn of policy.
It's a scandal that the vast majority of the Uk is completely unaware of - the 2 week delay before lockdown while "herd immunity" was actually the proposed plan has no doubt resulted in many more deaths than were necessary.Last edited by sasguru; 23 April 2020, 13:49.Hard Brexit now!
#prayfornodealComment
-
Originally posted by sasguru View PostThe fact that this "strategy" (which stinks of Dominic Cummings) was considered at all seriously should mean that Whitty and his sidekick, Vallance (yes-men both) should be sacked.
It's lucky that Neill Ferguson, and his colleagues at Imperial, were so appalled that they produced their seminal and influential paper, written mainly over the weekend of mid March.
It's a scandal that the vast majority of the Uk is completely unaware of.
Originally posted by Michael GovePeople in this country have had enough of experts.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment