• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Blackwashed

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Rebecca Loos
    Mmmm... DA, Gunman and Pinto, this sounds to me like a poor excuse to explain defeat. Contrary to popular belief, not every Kiwi (can't speak for the Saffos but I know for a fact this is true of the Aussies too) want to become a rugby player (thank God! My school was next to a big rugby-playing school and those guys were horrible)

    Also an Aussie colleague of mine just here tells me that even at soccer Australia are better than England as the last time they played, Australia won. Can't comment on that but he seems pretty sure of this fact.

    Anyway, DA, what you say is correct but the only valid conclusion to your piece is that English men are not as sporty as Antipodeans. I would agree especially given the number of, errr..., shall we say, well-fed looking men here ;-) (was especially true in Nottingham, more so than London)
    Good point loos, and my "defence" of the lions loss may to an extent be "sore loser".. An eminent Aussie rugby player wrote a column a number of years ago discussing the reasons why Australia punched (ALTHOUGH THEY ARE tulipE AT BOXING.. and darts for that matter ) above its weight in comparison to the poms. His conclusion purely and simply was that Australia invest far more money per capita in sport than the poms do. So for every pom who is out of condition there is a lack of sporting facilities at school and beyond to show for it.

    Although we Brits like to think that there is more to life than sport, and that it has become oppressive in the colonies, it is an absolute disgrace that sport is so undervalued and underdeveloped in the UK. The reason for this stinks.. it is thanks to socialists who hate competition and competitiveness.
    Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

    Comment


      #12
      Fair enough - I can see how in a way it can seem that the colonies seem to live in some sort of sport oppression.... actually there isn't anything in government policy to force you to be any good at any sport, but there can be a kind of peer / society pressure to do that.... in NZ anyway. In some ways. So maybe yes we are producing lots of good sportsmen, but not many outstanding artists, scientists etc... (Britain does produce lots of them). Maybe sport takes too big a place in NZ and Oz.
      Chico, what time is it?

      Comment


        #13
        pacific Islanders

        Originally posted by Alf W
        Excuse me but don't New Zealand pick the best players from pretty much the whole of the Pacific Ocean islands? There was talk of putting together a Pacific team for the Tri-Nations which would put the All Blacks back to a similar level to Argentina.

        Any, most people just assume people from New Zealand are Aussies anyway.
        That may be true, but without being part of the All Black training and playing system these guys would find their game would not develop as well. Having said that we should pull rank and have first choice of these players... hmmmm I can feel a recruitment opprtunity coming out of this
        Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

        Comment


          #14
          Boring NZ

          and a great lifestyle
          and the ability to come over to England for a few years and make tons of money to spend there
          and the outdoors
          and the food
          and stress-free working environments
          and great, varied scenery
          and... lots more
          ----------------------------------------------

          Why are so many of you lot over here AND never want to go back? All the Kiwis I know are going to live in Aussie after the UK kicks them out...

          I have lived in NZ. It is great for a holiday but it is boring as hell, there is no choice, it is far from anywhere, the food is no different to elsewhere(how can this be a plus?), it is full of hillbillies, and it is boring!

          What makes me laugh is all these Brits that emmigrate over there and realise living in a periphery country with no clout in the world is not much fun.

          Kiwis get very defensive when you slag off their little country - the truth hurts.

          Comment


            #15
            Re: invest far more money per capita?

            Originally posted by DodgyAgent
            His conclusion purely and simply was that Australia invest far more money per capita in sport than the poms do.
            It's more to do with the bad weather, the lack of space in towns to kick or whack a ball about, the plethora of alternative attractions, the fact that our pool of athletes are spread thinly over more sports than most countries, and the anti-competition brigade, who buggered junior school sports here for a generation. How much "investment" per capita will put that lot right?
            Last edited by stackpole; 11 July 2005, 22:11. Reason: Removed an insult to Hawaiian ladyboys

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by stackpole
              It's more to do with the bad weather, the lack of space in towns to kick or whack a ball about, the plethora of alternative attractions, the fact that our pool of athletes are spread thinly over more sports than most countries, and the anti-competition brigade, who buggered junior school sports here for a generation. How much "investment" per capita will put that lot right?
              I do noy buy the weather argument.. countries like Sweden produce top footballers and tennis players, the Netherlands also, as do the Russians. We also have here the widest mix of sport and a huge number of inactive children. Sports facilities should be built that can be used by kids at school and clubs.
              Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyone

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Rebecca Loos
                Mmmm... DA, Gunman and Pinto, this sounds to me like a poor excuse to explain defeat.
                I wasnt trying to explain the defeat, I was just pointing out that in the soccer world our official rank is quite high.

                My EXCUSE for the Lions is simple. They are not a team that trains together and plays together on a regular basis, sure they are some of the best players in the world, but they dont have that team understanding that goes with being part of a national team. That and Sir Clive having too much bias towards has been and out of condition England players over in form Welsh and Irish.
                Oh yeah and deliberately breaking our best player was out of order!
                I am not qualified to give the above advice!

                The original point and click interface by
                Smith and Wesson.

                Step back, have a think and adjust my own own attitude from time to time

                Comment


                  #18
                  Re: the weather argument

                  Originally posted by DodgyAgent
                  I do noy buy the weather argument.. countries like Sweden produce top footballers and tennis players, the Netherlands also, as do the Russians.
                  I'm not sure I agree with you there. Those countries tend to specialise in fewer sports. How many great Swedish footballers in history can you name, and how many great Dutch tennis players?

                  Australians have warm weather all the year round, so their kids can go out and play impromptu games with their mates any time they like. Think cricket - how often do you see kids in the UK having a knock-about, learning ball-skills at the genuine "grass-roots" level?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Also an Aussie colleague of mine just here tells me that even at soccer Australia are better than England as the last time they played, Australia won. Can't comment on that but he seems pretty sure of this fact.

                    Your colleague's statement doesn't deserve a serious reply. That would be like saying Holland are better at cricket than NZ, because they beat them once.

                    The game against Australia was a friendly, and under Sven friendlies are completely meaningless; he uses them as an opportunity to test different players and tactics.
                    England are a very strong team. The fact that we don't dominate is simply because football is a game played around the world and there are a number of exceptionally strong nations that could win the World Cup; Argentina, Brazil, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Holland, England -and then a number of strong nations just behind that group; Portugal, Czech Republic, etc.
                    By contrast, the number of great teams in rugby can be counted on a few fingers.

                    England usually do well in the major competitions, whereas Australia never qualify (despite being in a qualifying region with the Cook Islands!!!).
                    Autom...Sprow...Canna...Tik banna...Sandwol...But no sera smee

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by wendigo100
                      How many great Swedish footballers in history can you name?
                      Gunnar Nordahl, Gunnar Gren and Nils Liedholm.
                      Autom...Sprow...Canna...Tik banna...Sandwol...But no sera smee

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X