Substitution??? Substitution??? - Page 5
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Posts 41 to 43 of 43

Thread: Substitution???

  1. #41

    Godlike

    BR14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Under your kitchen sink
    Posts
    9,508

    Default

    <get the last word in> placeholder
    Entropy is NOT what it used to be.
    Inertia, however........................

  2. #42

    Contractor Among Contractors


    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    1,812

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by northernladuk View Post
    No.

    And there will never be one. A case will not hinge on one point alone. It's too complex and a multitude of factors will need to be consider to make a judgement. I would have though if there was anyone on gods earth that would know this it would be you.

    And another point, it's also even more unlikely to happen as substitution is less important as the other pillars, judges have commented on it and even Kate Cottrell has admitted it as so.

    Anything to add to this thread that's useful now JtB or are you done?
    the validity of any substitution clause is key in the CEST assessment and also in those of QDOS et al. So, the courts might not place the utmost of importance on it, but CEST and QDOS certainly do.

  3. #43

    Godlike

    BR14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Under your kitchen sink
    Posts
    9,508

    Default

    Q.E.D.
    Entropy is NOT what it used to be.
    Inertia, however........................

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •