Originally posted by BlueSharp
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Retrospective IR35 investigations
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View Posthe doesn't have to maintain a seat at the table, so he doesn't have to be. Generally, from what I can see, he has achieved much more than any other organisation, including that one which claims to represent the interests of many contractors.Originally posted by Stevie Wonder BoyI can't see any way to do it can you please advise?
I want my account deleted and all of my information removed, I want to invoke my right to be forgotten.Comment
-
Originally posted by SimonMac View PostHe's in danger of becoming known as an insurance provider rather than a campaigner, as unlikely a scenario that could ever be!Comment
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View Postwell, there isn't any reason why he can't be both.'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by northernladuk View PostApart from the bleeding obvious?Comment
-
Originally posted by Martin Bank Holiday View PostI would imagine going outside to inside in the same role or just accepting inside roles after having operated exclusively outside beforehand will certainly increase the chances of a retrospective investigation.Comment
-
Originally posted by DrStrange View PostWhat do people think of the flip side here? That HMRC will leave those who've gone inside alone and will instead target the few that remain outside?
Why chase the hard targets?
Anyone still outside has it very well covered (well their client does).See You Next TuesdayComment
-
Originally posted by Lance View PostNo chance.
Why chase the hard targets?
Anyone still outside has it very well covered (well their client does).Comment
-
Originally posted by ladymuck View PostI wonder if it depends on the clients too. If it's a firm they've wanted to haul over the coals for awhile, maybe they'll take a punt?Comment
-
Originally posted by JohntheBike View Postwell, there isn't any reason why he can't be both.
I don’t trust HMRC, but I also don’t trust people with a vested interest unless they provide proof.Last edited by Paralytic; 27 January 2020, 22:28.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment