I've got a potential client with an outside role. It's both outside in real terms, and on the basis of CEST - organisationally, they have concluded it's outside and I'm quite happy that its the truth.
What I'm conscious of is the risk of hitting April and them blanket banning Ltd Co contractors. It (obviously) hasn't happened yet, but it's a possibility and I'm trying to work out my risk exposure. To be clear, I am not talking about a re-decision that the role falls inside, but an overall decision not to engage with Ltd Co contractors.
If that does happen, and I was to go brolly, how exposed would I be?
There seems to be a presumption on the forum that moving to Brolly puts a huge target on your back, but ultimately Brolly != Inside, Brolly is simply out of scope. It doesn't seem to me that it could form any evidence in of itself.
I appreciate they could investigate the few months prior, but 1) It's only a few months 2) My CEST and working practices should show outside. But maybe I'm totally off basis and should just write the cheque now
What I'm conscious of is the risk of hitting April and them blanket banning Ltd Co contractors. It (obviously) hasn't happened yet, but it's a possibility and I'm trying to work out my risk exposure. To be clear, I am not talking about a re-decision that the role falls inside, but an overall decision not to engage with Ltd Co contractors.
If that does happen, and I was to go brolly, how exposed would I be?
There seems to be a presumption on the forum that moving to Brolly puts a huge target on your back, but ultimately Brolly != Inside, Brolly is simply out of scope. It doesn't seem to me that it could form any evidence in of itself.
I appreciate they could investigate the few months prior, but 1) It's only a few months 2) My CEST and working practices should show outside. But maybe I'm totally off basis and should just write the cheque now
Comment