• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

End of IT contracting this June?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by skysies View Post
    I posted this in another thread but thought it's worth starting a new discussion. Times reported on May planning to end IT contracting in the form we know it. There still will be, but most likely all will be inside IR35.
    The Times did no such thing. I suggest that you read what they actually wrote, based on what May had said, rather that Gerry McGlaughlin's "interesting" interpretation of what she said.

    The Times article can be found here.
    Best Forum Advisor 2014
    Work in the public sector? You can read my FAQ here
    Click here to get 15% off your first year's IPSE membership

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
      The Times did no such thing. I suggest that you read what they actually wrote, based on what May had said, rather that Gerry McGlaughlin's "interesting" interpretation of what she said.

      The Times article can be found here.
      A couple of interesting things from that.

      The problem is particularly acute in the delivery and technology service sectors, but ministers fear that the practice is spreading to more conventional parts of the economy.
      I don't see it as an acute problem as described in technology; it's more the state of play.

      However, the article then goes on to talking about control of workers. This for me should lead to a set of two contracts arriving based heavily on control, if that's the key theme. Contingent workers - freelance, gig economy, etc. should be served either a worker contract or a supplier contract, whereby the worker contract is Inside IR35 and you get the associated rights or a Supplier contract because you've got a limited company and its associated risks and costs.
      The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

      Comment


        #13
        I think that the public sector stuff is a red herring, no matter what happens, it'll be transferred across.

        It goes well? - Great! They got Capita et al to staff the void with body shops of FTC types and all is grand.
        Roll it out to the private sector

        It doesn't go well? - Huge void created with people walking to the private sector? That's because it's not a level playing field.
        Roll it out to the private sector

        Wyrd bið ful aræd

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by MarkT View Post
          That's because it's not a level playing field.
          Roll it out to the private sector
          Exactly.
          And don't forget the obligatory press release stressing how yet another "unfairness" has been fixed by the great moral crusaders at at HMRC.
          Create problem - Provide solution - Profit!
          Old as the hills.
          Help preserve the right to be a contractor in the UK

          Comment


            #15
            Will the roll this out in hte private sector too?

            Yes but is the article correct in what it says. If it is then not only public sector contractors are scuppered but private sector contractors will be too.

            "The report is going to recommend much stricter rules governing what is self-employment."

            "Perhaps they will allow contractors to continue contracting but through umbrella companies rather than PSCs."

            This is what is happening in the publci sector now. Why wouldn't it happen in 12 months in the private sector too?

            After all if the Government believe that a contractor earning £100,000 should pay the same tax and NI as a permie earning £100,000, why would they think this is fair that they pay the same tax in the public sector and not the private sector?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Craic View Post
              Yes but is the article correct in what it says. If it is then not only public sector contractors are scuppered but private sector contractors will be too.

              "The report is going to recommend much stricter rules governing what is self-employment."

              "Perhaps they will allow contractors to continue contracting but through umbrella companies rather than PSCs."

              This is what is happening in the publci sector now. Why wouldn't it happen in 12 months in the private sector too?

              After all if the Government believe that a contractor earning £100,000 should pay the same tax and NI as a permie earning £100,000, why would they think this is fair that they pay the same tax in the public sector and not the private sector?
              Because the private sector is far more savvy, aggressive and has deeper pockets to challenge than the Public Sector?
              "I can put any old tat in my sig, put quotes around it and attribute to someone of whom I've heard, to make it sound true."
              - Voltaire/Benjamin Franklin/Anne Frank...

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by cojak View Post
                Because the private sector is far more savvy, aggressive and has deeper pockets to challenge than the Public Sector?
                I wouldn't bank on that in every case in the private sector by any means. There is a significant and increasing trend for companies in the UK to win work and apart from project managing it in the UK, actually off shoring all the actual work. I am talking about oil and gas sector but it applies to a wide range of industries. In addition to that, another emerging trend that is sure to grow is that project hire roles are made on FTC rather than Ltd Co contractor basis. In my own office, right here there are four long term contracting guys engaged on FTC terms. They need to feed their families at the end of the day, you take what is going. In another office on the same project, there are considerably more too. I'm not saying the world as we know it will be changed overnight, but the direction of travel is clear I'm afraid.
                Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
                Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by cojak View Post
                  Because the private sector is far more savvy, aggressive and has deeper pockets to challenge than the Public Sector?
                  ^^^This

                  You forget the private sector isn't ruled by people who are afraid they won't get their promotion if they don't comply.
                  "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Craic View Post
                    After all if the Government believe that a contractor earning £100,000 should pay the same tax and NI as a permie earning £100,000, why would they think this is fair that they pay the same tax in the public sector and not the private sector?
                    I guess "they" don't understand that a company would hire a contractor for an engagement and accept the £100,000 cost but wouldn't hire someone and pay them the same rate, it would be significantly lower to cover all the guff that goes with employing a permie.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
                      ^^^This

                      You forget the private sector isn't ruled by people who are afraid they won't get their promotion if they don't comply.
                      It really depends how they proceed post Taylor. If the PS rules are extended to the private sector, I tend to agree (although there will still be a large number of companies whose approach to risk/compliance will dictate caution). If they opt for a statutory definition of self employment (which I support, in principle, and see as increasingly likely in practice), there won't be nearly the same scope for fudging/subjectivity.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X